>>2246737Okay so check this out. You can see the guy's shirt is untucked right? And you can tell from his belt that he's obviously a trucker. So that means this guy must have been driving all night. He came here in a hurry to grab a bite to eat before continuing his route.
Now the waiter has the same eyes and hair color as the red shirt guy, and you can tell from his facial expression that they know each other personally. Therefore you can safely deduce they're brothers, or at the very least close relatives. He looks worried, perhaps embarrassed even. Something is wrong in their relationship. And yet, red shirt guy came here, and he looks calm, so red shirt guy must be oblivious to the problem. The waiter is therefore hiding something.
Now next up, we see that red shirt guy is wearing a ring, and the waiter isn't. Now that these pieces of the puzzle are in place, adultery is the logical conclusion. So is the dead woman the wife? No, she can't be, I hear you think: she's not wearing her ring either! Lots of adulterers however, tend to take off their ring when they're away from their spouse, so we can't be sure.
Now the woman on the right, the first thought that comes to mind is the hijab. She's muslim. But then you forget the fact that no muslim woman would ever wear a purple hijab! Purple ofcourse being the color of nobility, status. A hijab is meant to provoke modesty, which would be in direct violation. So therefore, this woman is NOT muslim. But why is she hiding her face? Ah but ofcourse, SHE is the wife, desperately trying to hide the fact she just came in to visit her boytoy waiter, while her husband was on his truck route.