>>22476517Many such cases. Hope you pass.
>>22476536How many men will love on a nice feminine body and talk about all the things they would do... until the dick is revealed. Like nigger you just said you dive into that ass face first ten seconds ago, but because you've now learned a fact that you don't like, those visually appealing features are suddenly all gross and bad? That's obviously the stigma talking. Furthermore, it blurs the line between a desirable male and desirable female body, forcing questions like "is it gay if they pass?" or "where am I on the Kinsey scale?"
It has its roots in ancient metaphysics, like most persistent problems in Western belief. Dividing literally all things that exist into "masculine" and "feminine" natures, and then treating all men and women as if they are supposed to embody these imagined ideals is schizo as fuck. You didn't "identify" the "essential nature" of the male and female: you made that shit up. Human beings are biological organism with a nature that is in flux because it is contingent on a fluctuating Earth ecosystem that constantly shifts evolutionary pressures and forces permanent genetic changes to all gene pools, such that even sexual dimorphism fluctuates in degree and even reverses in some species over time. That means things like "human nature" and, by extension, "masculine" and "feminine", are not absolute, unchanging, and eternal fixed categories, but reflections of a contingent and ever-evolving state. By further extension, sexual orientation is also messy and not so clear-cut - we have femboys, tomboys, girly-girls, man's men, bears, otters, twinks, amazonians (muscle mommies), hunk bottoms, trap tops, mtf, ftm - all activating people's neurons in seemingly inexplicable ways, and it's often a combination of these different types or even groupings of attraction based on "vibes" for that day or even that moment. To be "straight" is more of a willful commitment than a rigid, natural "orientation".
