>>22581095>What the heck is 4chan culture?4chan's original culture is spamming lolicon pornography, guro, and calling people a "nigger" (not in a racist way, but rather in a uniquely 4chanlike way of using it as a catchall insult). Moot was the original owner of the site, but he wasn't really the head of 4chan. He didn't really "post" in any one board or direct people how to think, or even tell people what to post (aside from the actual site rules, which very explicitly forbid posting illegal content like actual photographs of child sexual abuse). 4chan was always full of lies, deliberately exaggerated accounts of reality, and people who spammed unfunny forced memes.
Yes, 4chan was always the rubbish bin of the Internet. It was never a place known engaging in either for left-wing OR right-wing activism, except for the sake of extracting so-called "lulz", and even the 2016 MAGA movement was just something that people jumped into not because of xenophobia or a moral panic of sorts, but rather as a way of proving that 4channers could influence the course of politics.
The problem with calling me a "Nazi" is that "Naziism" is a unique ideology that rose in the 1930s in Germany that focused on anti-Semitism and the extermination of so-called undesirables, as well as the collaboration between the state and private entities for the sake of engaging in the Greater Germany expansionist project, and thus, by calling me or anyone else a "Nazi", you are cheapening the emotional value of the word "Nazi". If anybody who is not an identity politics-supporting liberal were a "Nazi", then that would mean that being called a "Nazi" would have no shock value because many people, even people without genocidal ambitions, could be called "Nazis" too. By throwing what is meant to be a slur word around in an unrestrained manner, you lead people to identify your kind with the word. Remember the story of "The Boy Who Cried Wolf", if you have heard of it.
