>>22617410>>22617447Here's a Long girthy truthnvke for you. "Sexual orientation" is a fake and gay concept created by Retarded Victorians and, and people had the right idea about sexuality before the 19th century. People can have preferences for either one or both genders, don't get me wrong. But this is no different from taste in Movies, Vidya, or food (and at least food taste is partially caused by gut bacteria). Gay, Straight, Bi, whatever as identities make sexual preferences mystified in ways that other kinds of preferences aren't, People now deterministically see them as being "part of you" instead of a person looking at a dick or a pussy and thinking "huh nice" or "ew gross" the same way they decide what kinds of shows they like.
>But people can't just change what they like!Never said they could. But you also can't just decide on a whim that You don't like Horror movies any more and instead only like like spic telenovelas. All ofyour likes and dislikes are out of your control. Immutability does not make Sexual attraction special. Now what do I mean by pre 19th century people having the right idea? I mean that a gay or straght person wasn't considered a thing back then. Sure, they knew some people either liked one sex specifically or liked both, or neither if they were defective. but the focus was purely on the act, not the person. A guy who only fucked guys wasn't "gay", he was just "a guy who only fucked guys". Evidence for this way of thinking being true is how the populations of people with those preferences have never been consistant throughout time suggesting what people liked is an Acquired tastes created through socialization. For example in Pre christian Rome, Claudius was the only Emperor to be described as only liking women, with Historian Cassius Dio and Suetonius Describing how weird people found him because of it.
