https://archived.moe/bant/thread/22682300/#q22682780Wallace was concerned that what's out there might be bad, and a human core needed to be fortified, what extends it expendable.
He didn't care enough to give each a good life. Didn't take care of doubts and disaster for them. Do his part in their immortality. Didn't even give them a chance. One cut before dreams were reality or anything was found just for them, passed on by being practiced, existed in the moment.
He was cruel, uncaring to avoid commitment, didn't find through that ability that would enable him to see entities immense. A way of seeking and nurturing something nice. Even in enemies. See past defences defeating them, conversing and caring for what they could be. Cores catered to, commanding the rest, instead of pressured by it. Surface made pleasant, respectable.
He didn't lead by example. Deckard wasn't decent either, but if showing compassion she could have been hurt more to keep him compliqnt. Rachel's clone... Needed her Deckard, and he was older, unsuitable. So clone himself.
She, the original might have been gone, but there is a question if that is entirely. Painstakingly reassembled from ashes, memories, might be enough/everything. Them returned to optimal states. In time, a goal for technology.
The cop cheif was cruel, but she cared enough to try to do the right thing in the end. It's appealing to join an organisation that opposes wrong, but too big to address, and orders to do wrong isn't excusable, it confuses and corrupts the whole thing. Treason to conscience is cowardice, and is letting by the notion wrong is in command. Right actions token appeasement, public relations to obtain trust, power, faith, entrustment of heroism that marginalises actual heroes and makes them fools facing impossible odds. Failing except in standing on the right side.
Stories are for such people. Maybe it's vetter they are so flattered by facing harder than the rest. While active the impossible posssi
