/bant/ - International/Random » Thread #22776774

[19 / 5 / ?]

80KiB, 638x663, 1748729515519199.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Amazing how good the anti-dust tech was back then.

Anonymous Wed 04 Jun 2025 20:19:23 No.22776774 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>22776775 >>22776778 >>22776779 >>22776780 >>22776783 >>22776785

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO buzz-aldrin-punches-moon-landing (...).gif, 718KiB, 220x232

Anonymous Wed 04 Jun 2025 20:21:40 No.22776775 Report

Quoted By:

>>22776774
>don't believe me? Well, take that!

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 04 Jun 2025 20:22:38 No.22776776 Report

Quoted By:

remember how good google was in 2015

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 13v00whyhvzz.jpg, 2MiB, 4048x3036

Anonymous Wed 04 Jun 2025 20:23:33 No.22776777 Report

Quoted By:

Team Dyson where you at?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 04 Jun 2025 20:27:35 No.22776778 Report

Quoted By:

>>22776774
You know how rockets work right? They shove shit out of the way. Like loose hyperfine moondust on a landing site with 1/6th G. The site was scoured of any form of movable material before the lander touched down.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 04 Jun 2025 20:28:46 No.22776779 Report

Quoted By:

>>22776774
>why didn't the dust circulate back onto the lander in this airless vacuum?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 04 Jun 2025 20:29:54 No.22776780 Report

Quoted By:

>>22776774
Eglin bots deserve death. Stop poisoning the well of real conspiracies.

There is no wind or air on the moon. No turbulence to kick up dust.

Do you also think the commies (which deserve death) would not call out sny amerigolem propaganda to cuck them?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 04 Jun 2025 20:30:38 No.22776781 Report

Quoted By: >>22776782

Let's say you have conclusive proof tomorrow that the landing was fake, and everyone believes you
What do you think happens

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO baconcopter.gif, 1MiB, 620x521

Anonymous Wed 04 Jun 2025 20:34:13 No.22776782 Report

Quoted By: >>22776792

>>22776781
Paid shills with memeflags start derailing my threads with flat earth posts

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 04 Jun 2025 20:36:18 No.22776783 Report

Quoted By: >>22776786

>>22776774
I'll bite.
Without atmosphere dust doesn't get whirled up in the same way. When landing, the rocket engine would have blown away all lose debris in a large radius. Dust wouldn't get on the feet of the lander unless an astronaut put it there with a shovel.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 04 Jun 2025 20:36:41 No.22776784 Report

Quoted By:

>maybe the Us wasn't legitimate with it's first moon landings
I could believe that
>SPACEE OS FAAAAAAKKKKEEEE FLAT EARTH NASA OS SATANIC DEVIL ILLUMINATI ICEWALLLL
how it ends every time

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 04 Jun 2025 20:36:56 No.22776785 Report

Quoted By: >>22776789

>>22776774
Because of the lack of air on the moon, "dust" doesn't behave like it does on Earth. If swirled up it falls down easily again due to no resistance. And it doesn't stick to objects like it does on Earth. The dust on Earth is composed of many different molecules, not just powdered rock.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 04 Jun 2025 20:42:01 No.22776786 Report

Quoted By: >>22776787 >>22776790

>>22776783
>Dust wouldn't get on the feet of the lander unless an astronaut put it there with a shovel.
That's not true, it could also be attracted by static electricity. I wonder if the lunar lander had any kind of skin charge put through it intentionally to prevent this?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1663075980407245.jpg, 169KiB, 965x1024

Anonymous Wed 04 Jun 2025 20:46:04 No.22776787 Report

Quoted By: >>22776788

>>22776786
If only it was wrapped with some kind of non conductive material

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 04 Jun 2025 20:48:15 No.22776788 Report

Quoted By:

>>22776787
the eglin shills working overtime here makes me realize we are on the right path

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 04 Jun 2025 20:50:12 No.22776789 Report

Quoted By:

>>22776785
Why would it not stick? They're electrically charged particles

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 04 Jun 2025 20:50:13 No.22776790 Report

Quoted By: >>22776791

>>22776786
>attracted by static electricity.
Would still require an atmosphere for the electricity to charge. That's why there is no lightning in space, anon.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 04 Jun 2025 20:56:01 No.22776791 Report

Quoted By:

>>22776790
How do you retards say incorrect shit so confidently

https://youtu.be/QR6jmZGYSgU?t=112

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 04 Jun 2025 20:56:45 No.22776792 Report

Quoted By:

>>22776782
I'm just asking a question bro

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches

Amazing how good the anti-dust tech was back then.