>>22820170Ivanhoe Mines, Lifezone Metals, Meteoric Resources if you like bottom fishing. If you think oil is going to stay above $65, there's plenty to choose from: Petrobras, Whitecap, Logan, Spartan Delta, etc.
>>22820174>Just a few months ago my city did a big clear cut on a 100 year old forest next to a residential area only for pure profit.Are you absolutely certain they didn't clear cut that area right next to the residential area in order to expand the residential area or to build some infrastructure? Terrible if so, it's bad for biodiversity and it looks ugly too. Clear cutting should be limited to specific circumstances like buildings and infrastructure. Worth noting that forest owners typically cut down trees that are like 60-80 years old by the way, that is a ripe age for harvest in purely economic terms.
>But clear cuts are becoming less common. The golden age of destroying our forests was somewhere between 1940s and 1980s. Thanks boomers.This was my point, we are probably among the most sustainable countries in the forestry industry. It's not perfect (never will be) but we do a bang on job and we're getting better at protecting our biodiversity. Do note that in that time we also added a lot of infrastructure and we had a much bigger industrial footprint as a nation though.
By the way, Anglo American Platinum has a world class PGM/battery metals project in Lapland that they have tried to push through for like two decades now. They still don't have social license to build it because there happens to be a certain kind of swamp that is deemed to be important for biodiversity. The locals and environmentalists are steadfastly rallied against the project. I have no horse in the race either way, I think whatever the locals and the company decide together is what should happen. If the answer to development there is a resounding "no" from the locals then let the ore stay underground I guess
