>>22812950The primary, principal problem with christendom and the way it's organised, is that most people's beliefs are construed out of singular verses quoted out of the context of the chapter and the book they were written in.
If you read the chapter and then read the verse as part of the chapter, you almost always get a completely different interpretation from the one that's being presented by the priest, reverend or the other guys/girls in conversation.
It's very simple the way they do this.
Goes as such.
There's a verse about jubilation coming at some point in the OT.
Therefore, the quantum financial system will bring jubilation to us in this time.
That's what and how they argue.
When you read the chapter, it's a specific jubilation for a specific people in a specific place and nobody else.
That automatically destroys their argument, and they won't have it because the Bible says so.
If only they bloody read their gay pedophile travesty, the rape of an original work composed to deify Julius Caesar and exploit that legacy to control the entire empire through religion, then they wouldn't think to argue silly shit.
Another example.
Adam and Eve were thrown out of the garden of Eden for eating the forbidden fruit.
Therefore Man has fallen and sinned and is forever doomed unless repenting before the Lord, and this applies to ALL because everyone's descendant from Adam and Eve.
No that didn't happen.
"Garden of Eden" = Gar dúnn Éydinn. "Warm (place) nearby the rock (at the river) Éydinn." Edinburgh.
"Adam" = redhead.
"Eve" = Ewe. It's not a woman, it's fucking agriculture and animal husbandry.
"Forbidden fruit" = fungus. Mushrooms.
Then explicitly stated in the story, they were exiled into a world where other humans already roamed. The implication is that they weren't related at all.
The majority of Christians don't ask critical questions the way Jesus taught them in His example.
