Crucifixion was the epitome of degradation, reserved for the lowest classes (slaves, bandits, non-citizens). Cicero called it "the most cruel and disgusting penalty", unfit for Roman citizens. The process-public flogging, carrying the cross, prolonged agony was meant to strip dignity and deter rebellion.
Jesus's death by crucifixion would have signaled to Romans that he was a criminal or subversive, unworthy of respect. His apparent powerlessness unable to resist arrest or execution would align with weakness and failure in Roman eyes. The mocking inscription "King of the Jews" further humiliated him, framing him as a failed rebel against Roman authority.
By Roman standards, Jesus's submission to crucifixion, without fighting back or asserting dominance, would likely be seen as pathetic and weak. His cry of "My God, why have you forsaken me?" could be interpreted as emotional frailty, contrary to Stoic ideals of composure.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIIH9hzHG3s&t=104It's a thing, like many other things. I want to destroy the USA and give it over to the Jews so we can finally commit to their expulsion of the entire polyergus formica. So my biased view is that he was a real man, he really did use the name of god to convince people that he did miracles, which are real in that everyone beleived him which makes them true, relatively, and that he kicked off the system that would later produce the two most powerful nations on planet that were both infected and then brought to its knees by rat fink shit fucking Jews. The people who created Christ in the first place.
There is no disproving, only education and coming to grips with what we know and what we're going to do with what we know.
