>>22878485>instead they want you to disprove the textbook so it can be discarded for something betterthat's not true, refer to the peer review video i posted
>>22878458anything that goes against what's written in the textbooks is labeled as lunacy
the first step in the methodology of science is an observation, i can pick any topic, and if there is no observation but presupposition of it, then it's pseudoscience, i hope we can agree on that
i can pick a topic, evolution for example, there is no observation of life springing out of nothing, which i believe is the mainstream evolution theory, therefore it's based on a presupposition, making it pseudoscience, yet it's still in the textbooks, making it dogmatic
the only way you can defend evolution is by making fallacious arguments, that's why it's still labeled as a theory
>(((Religious people))) do the complete opposite, they demand that you "believe in" the Bible or theyll attack youthose are the extremes, same thing happens on the other side with the people pushing what's written in the textbooks, this thread is a good example of this
thank you for reading my tedx talk
