>>22981216Oh, but it is a transaction.
Almost everything is.
What is flirting? Don't you really just haggle her price by paying first with your time and energy?
I'd say it's a shitty gacha with risks involved.
What do you divert your finite energy and attention to?
Is that not an investment?
Most relationships are quite clearly transactional, it's just accepted or understood not to call it that way.
Mostly because both parties honor it or because one party benefits more from instilling it as taboo than the other party.
Just be a little more attentive at taking notes on the ratio of give and take in the long term and the value each.
I just think it's simpler, not necessarily easier, to cut to the chase and look for places where I can strike the balance between comfort and environmental factors influencing fair satisfaction for both.
Provided you don't end up in a place that enables the gals to ruin a fair deal with stupid ideas (kidnapping, murder etc.) , you can eke out satisfaction for all at an affordable price.
You just gotta find the gals that live in a situation where it's economically and logically undeniably better to enthusiastically choose this situation in comparison to what other options exist.
Too stupid to cheat and too smart to cheat is also getting a much more important factor nowadays, vetting costs a lot of time and effort.
Anyways, let's get back to op and my suggestion:
And just look at his money:
597,000÷2÷50> 5000 days of having two young fertile girls serve and live with you with a shit eating grin, barefoot, pregnant and maybe still dripping at the thought of having a still healthy body.