>>23178586This is a very good projection of what you believe to be important and fulfilling in a social interaction. Different people have different needs, wants and opinions therefore a single blanket statement of x, y and z are the only ways to effectively socialize is inappropriate. My question was rhetorical and a form of a litmus test. You're guilty of the one true Scotsman fallacy claiming that social interaction can't happen online with real people because a true social interaction can only happen face to face. This is the pitfall of your hypothesis. Your designation is not all encompassing nor is it empirical.
The equivalent argument would be "all real life social interactions are better than online interactions" which again is relative and a broad statement. Would you say being berated by your boss is better than talking shit online?
I hope you see the folly of your stance and how foolish it makes you look.
>oh yeah well what's your argument smart guy You can't designate worth for everyone on any one thing. It's why we have multiple religions, why flat earth is still a thing and why some people go to therapy and others don't.
Fulfillment, worth and meaning are all subjective.
