>>23189656>no it doesn't you moron, my police are the same as yoursyou jackass you were criticizing the police COMPARED to Australian police, please read back you uneducated Ponce..
>alright so i guess it's pointless to have guns thenhow does that make any sense??? by that logic every country should just give up to the ones who own nukes and surrender their land
>firearm deaths in america are a bigger problem than stabbings in britain, if you disagree kyslike I said I'd rather have freedom over safety. No reason to kill you if there's no punishment for beating the shit out of you and robbing your home + people go to prison for defending themselves.
in that police state killing doesn't matter because there's no one stopping them anyways.
freedom>safety
20% of US homicides were self defense (something you cant do in the UK)
50 percent were crimes of passion.. so idk how guns would stop that because only about 14 PERCENT were gun related.. so like I said it'd happen anyways..
only about 12% were gang related
and our interpersonal: UK Proportion: 40%–55% of homicides (250–350 out of ~650) are interpersonal, with 20%–25% (126–159) specifically “crimes of passion.”
US Proportion: 50%–55% of homicides (7,672–8,439 out of 15,343) are interpersonal, with a similar 20%–25% for “acts of passion.” (groku)
so nothing really changes you just have less freedoms and you're less safe.
the US has more crimes of passion than the UK.. but less than a qauter are done with gons