>>23351032Asian mysticism is a largely tautological sophistry, responsible for Asia's failure to maintain parity with the West
the East had to broadly conform itself to Western philosophy and science in an attempt to compete, which it still broadly cannot (other than in the use of slave labour for the production of trinkets and baubles to sell to the West, largely thanks to Kissinger exporting industry to China, handing it to them on a plate; Japan is an exception to this, as it elevated itself into being a European country through sheer force of will)
this marks a failure of understanding, and what good is a philosophical framework and canon which provides nothing in the way of answer, and worse, attempts to excuse this by asserting there to be no question in the first place?
it is circular, and paradoxical
paradoxes provably do not exist in reality, and are always merely the product of limited perspective
more concretely, no examples of Eastern revolutionisation really come to mind; even Asia's political revolutions were imported
and you yourself are an example of this exact type of failure, downstream as it is from your philosophy:
>furry subculture AI sloppa wearing an American space suit as Freudian-Sartrean psychological mutable self-representationwhat is authentic and original about any of this? it's all replication; talk about a Journey to the West!
you claim to represent something distinct from Western civilisation, even as you mimic it poorly, hanging around Westerners, accessing them via your Western machine, begging for their attention
a living microcosm of the failure of "Buddhism teachings"
what a joke, and one which will fall on deaf ears
