>>23484451 >>23484438>I'd mock you, but I had to twist myself into similar knots and massively misinterpret and misrepresent Christianity when I was opposed to it, too. You're not an idiot. You're me just a few years ago.YHWH allows child brides. Including by rape (tahphas; to take, as to take a city).
You oppose this.
Because you are a Christian.
See:
>518426582>The law of Moses has been abrogated. To attempt it is now sin.>519338987>Nah, Jesus new rules, that's the christ in Christian. Never ever said that. That's Jews my dude. He said one WIFE one man, and to have a wife had to be of age. So you are grasping at straws That is the christian position: YHWH's laws are abrogated
>519394749>Who asked you?Want to fucking fight VPN dip fucking shit? This is a public forum
>519394779She used to be 12 according to the Catholic Church, and 9 according to Orthodox christians,
then she was 14, now according to protestants she is 16.
>>23484478>yeah it's almost like it was written 2000-3500 years ago by savages that had a radically lesser understanding of the physical world than we doThey were of the species:
Man.
You are of the species:
Human.
Different species. Wolf vs Dog.
They raped little girls, ruled over the female as a Ba'al (master, lord), had as many women and girl children to rape (tahphas) as they wished.
They were:
Man
You are chosen /by/ the woman, you have but 1 wife, you are "husband" (caretaker), you do not have little girls as brides, you are:
Human.
YHWH is correct. Marry little girls.
>>23484479You're not Man. You are Human. Thus you conceptualize a different God. Just as a Cat has a different god than Man (which you are not: you are a domesticated version: Human)
>>23484480You oppose men marrying girl children. I am not lying. I've talked to 100s of "fellow chirstians". Christianity is a feminist religion for HUMANs, Not Man.
