>>23484996Republicans are acting like porn is seriously harmful (it's not), that there's some psychological effects that causes people to seek out more extreme porn (it's not, most men stick to PIV scenes with conventionally attractive women who act like they're eager and having fun), and that it's bad for relationships (teens that consumed porn were more likely to have sex, and reported greater desire to be married; unsurprisingly, those who abstained were more likely to be virgins in their mid 20s).
The point is, basically every claim trads make about the dangers of porn is empirically wrong. This can safely be used to dismiss their opinions on ID verification. It's not surprising that the biggest anti-porn activists like Andrew Wilson are mentally unwell loons (who often try to erase their paper trails of fraud, scams, cult leadership, the weird beliefs of said cults they profit from, and unusual and unsavory behaviors).
