>>23526317>socialmedia filters. Same reason people say 'unalive' now.i guess it's only for the purpose of advertisers
it's easy, especially for those companies, to make a filter which can tell whether someone is talking about grapes or rape from context, and it's been that way for almost a decade
it would barely take more effort than censoring the string "rape"
it's funny they don't care about rape on their platforms at all, just advertiser money
>>23526312plausible deniability, "i was just talking about grapes"
obviously there's not much of that in the example in OP's image, but it happens with pedophiles signalling to each other, for example
it's cool everyone is getting into that now
>>23526317>why do you care about Tee as a american? Its tea in your place right?well i was more thinking T shirts, sometimes those are called/written as "tees"
i think it has other meanings
