I've just created a cool story. It is about hybrid between fishes and humans that emerges from the depths of the sea (they look quite a bit like humans, the anatomy is very similar) and start attacking humans. The government soon land its troops on the hybrids ("titans") and try to exterminate them, but they are resistant against bullets. The whole world soon gets to know about the titans, and political parties and animal rights movements advocate for the love and respect for the titans. It gets to a point where coexistence between animal and titans actually happen and more and more titans divide the Earth with humans.
But in a certain point of the story titans eventually start killing humans and they become an even stronger threat to humanity and their sovereignty. The Earth become a chaos and North Korea launches atomic bombs in the whole world as a last resort measure. Thinking they had exterminated the whole humanity and titans, North Koreans are surprised when living titans approach their island and kill them all.
I don't know if this look like a product of /pol/'s ideology/hatred, but my intention isn't that. I thinked about playing with the human sovereignty and the irony of including the species that threat humanity in the own human society, and how political thinking could lead to compromising the very own human existence.
On the human sovereignty, the opposite of it is symbolized by works such as Godzilla or any kind of aliens or space invaders (I'm not referring to the game to the game, but it works too). The idea of killing and exterminating or biologucal enemies has been treated as natural (or at least I think so, but my repertoire is a little limited tb*h), but what if political ideology nulled this, leading to the extermination of humanity? That is what is behind my idea.
