>>23639864No I was presenting you an argument made by the Germans in WW1 after experiencing the trench shotgun. They deemed it cruel and barbaric calling for it to be banned. It obviously wasn't.
>hollow points and expanding roundsFragmentation of the round makes saving them nearly impossible. They're designed to maim and ensure a slow torturous death.
>incendiary weaponsYou can't effectively control fire and it then becomes a problem for civilians in the area.
>chemical weaponsYou can't control the direction of the wind and this poses a risk to civilians in the area.
>lasers They're designed to maim instead of kill. You can't have weapons that are intended to blind people. Have you even read the Geneva conventions?
Regardless you didn't answer my question. Why do you think drones should be a war crime?
