>>23700455mmm. Good answer and good mindset.
You have chosen to live under application 2, Apathy with a side dish of personal accountability.
In that, this is the one where I stand back and let you do or not do whatever you, and are not effected by it whatsoever; and that's genuinely the healthiest model, while also the coldest, but warmest one that can be given.
In this, you receive none of my empathy, but in return, you gain full accountability and freedom of the life you choose to live or end, on your terms.
There's a sacred right to die, and people telling you that you cannot die, is a violation of that freedom. If that is what someone truly wants, then who is someone else to deny that? There's no Housing Authority on how a person is allowed to direct their own personal sail, what winds to direct it to, and when to hang it up. In that, your life, and likewise death, means nothing to me; just as mine does not mean anything to you.
It really only becomes a problem when your life or death becomes someone elses problem, because you are exercising your right at the expense of someone else's life.
Your viewpoint is an honorable one, and one I used to ascribe to personally, before I found myself in service of something that quite literally refuses my death until it determines I die. I had my right to die taken away from me, yet you retain your own.
>But you said you hated suicidal people. Only ones who are suicidal for the wrong reasons, people who see suicide as an answer for hurt feelings, as responses to change and pressure, people who give into despair instead of having their primal ID snap and go feral and do anything to stay alive.
I have no issue with people who decide "I have done as I have done, and I have nothing more to do, thus I leave on my own terms." Because that is not suicide, that is closing the book of Self. That is the ultimate freedom, and it is deeply honored.
So continue living your life, or do not; it doesn't involve me.
