>>23690122when you say "she is not a good girl" it comes off as "she is not a good person." Which is the same kind of "she's evil" shit that the other spurned crashouts spew.
>I just think she is being put on too high of a pedestal I mean I agree, but I think you're similarly putting her on too low of one. I've seen nothing to indicate that she'd "ruin" anyone. You make it seem like the instant someone gets into a relationship with her she turns super-abusive, or goes out cheating on them every night. And really that just seems like insecurity and more attempts to stifle feelings than an attempt to be objective.
I get it, there are things about Binx that I absolutely would love in a woman. She's lively, has fun interests, is generally very sweet and outgoing, and obviously she's very attractive, and by comparison I can MAYBE check one or two of those boxes on a good day. I'm sure a lot of guys here feel the same. At the same time, she is very lazy, stubborn, disorganized, can be very spiteful when sufficiently pushed, and while I wouldn't say she's completely selfish, she definitely prioritizes herself and I can't see that changing in a relationship.
These are all things that would make it very hard to be in a relationship with her, and you're not wrong to point those things out. But you say she's not worthy of love, and I don't think that's fair either. Only truly evil people make themselves unworthy of love, and Binx just isn't that, and to say she's unworthy of love is just unfair, and moreover implies that many people here are unworthy as well, probably both of us included. I flat out reject that premise.
I get what you're trying to do here, warning others about letting infatuation blind and damage them, but banging on the "she's bad" drum isn't the way to go about it.
At any rate, I'm sorry if I went too hard on you thinking you were more in line with that other faggot, and I hope anyone that's unhealthily stuck on Binx can figure things out.
