Domain changed to archive.palanq.win . Feb 14-25 still awaits import.
[3 / 2 / ?]

ID:bGdFohU0 No.2377900 View ViewReplyOriginalReport
The problem with 'thicc' or 'thiccness' (a popular term to connote thick, i.e. voluptuous females, wide hips and large breasts and buttocks) is that it creates a marketplace in which the higher amount of females with said 'thicness', the less variety there is in the 'marketplace' and the lower the value of said 'thicc' women. Take one voluptuous woman in a room of twenty thin women. Who will stand of the most? Biologically, males have often been more attracted to women with wider hips, larger buttocks and breasts than those with smaller ones. If you would to increase the amount of 'thicc' women in the room from one to twenty, then that said original woman would stand out far less. Here, you would create a new norm, if you will, which in turns decreases the value of 'thicc' women. The woman's USP is decimated, and she is then compared more heavily to other females. In turn, this would turn into a savage competition, in which higher and higher levels of 'thickness' must be passed to match that original standard. Freak shows of human beings would be produced simply to sate the desire of a fetish obsessed male audience. Demand and supply, the higher the demand, the higher supply would have to be increased. What was once could be considered almost a 'luxury' good would become an inferior one. The price of gold stays the same due to unique laws and historical and economic reasons. But the value of currency is always fluctuating, and thicc women would be no different. What is essentially a bubble, would soon bust. The value of thicc women would drastically go down, and those with a more unique body type with become more highly sought after, thin women for example, case being that this is a complete reverse of the beginning scenario.