[5 / 1 / 1]
Quoted By:
Comrades, I come to you again. As you can see in my last thread: >>23825965
I simply ran out of space last time. I have since been plagued with many doubts about the sanctity of communism, and Marxism altogether. Whether it is as stalwart and dependable as I had previously thought. I started to question the nature of the state, whether or not it's duplicitous in its own right that it is left so undefined and unremarked. Surely, it cannot be a part of some greater machination can it not? what was Marx really attempting to ascribe here in actuality, one cannot say for certain. But surely the obvious answer then isn't simply to concentrate all the resources to the machinations of the great state, surely not then, no...but simply put, where art thou to be? some type of greater type of unregulated organization by the people themselves? the answer simply put, cannot be realized or fully understood until it is fully put into motion by the mechanisms themselves. That is, we cannot simply know what a true proletarian ownership of the means of production we cease be to take form, until it is put into action...
The state growing out of proportion, almost like a great octopus, wherein it takes hold over all resources and decision-making processes (thereby concentrating violence and coercion as well)
But nonetheless, after my worrisome troubles and preconceived notions were abated, I soon started to see a vision of the future being cobbled together and resembling the current socio-political climate. I come to question and rebuke Marx's dialectical materialism even more, in that I question really the notion of a nationless world, where there are no such borders against the outside world.
I simply ran out of space last time. I have since been plagued with many doubts about the sanctity of communism, and Marxism altogether. Whether it is as stalwart and dependable as I had previously thought. I started to question the nature of the state, whether or not it's duplicitous in its own right that it is left so undefined and unremarked. Surely, it cannot be a part of some greater machination can it not? what was Marx really attempting to ascribe here in actuality, one cannot say for certain. But surely the obvious answer then isn't simply to concentrate all the resources to the machinations of the great state, surely not then, no...but simply put, where art thou to be? some type of greater type of unregulated organization by the people themselves? the answer simply put, cannot be realized or fully understood until it is fully put into motion by the mechanisms themselves. That is, we cannot simply know what a true proletarian ownership of the means of production we cease be to take form, until it is put into action...
The state growing out of proportion, almost like a great octopus, wherein it takes hold over all resources and decision-making processes (thereby concentrating violence and coercion as well)
But nonetheless, after my worrisome troubles and preconceived notions were abated, I soon started to see a vision of the future being cobbled together and resembling the current socio-political climate. I come to question and rebuke Marx's dialectical materialism even more, in that I question really the notion of a nationless world, where there are no such borders against the outside world.
