>>23859668>so we can here establish that pyramids appear quite often in the media, but also in real life in archelogy like I've mentioned so there has to be a correlation or direct link it's not just a random occurrence also it just makes a lot of sense and adds up if you think about it but unfortunately most people would deny that and be like "wtf u talkin bout bro LOL" stupid dim witted mindless peasantsi think one reason you often see pyramids, atleast archeologically, is that they're just big piles of shit more or less
like, they're relatively easy monuments to engineer/construct, compared to other weirder shapes or even obelisks
it's similar to the argument which says shitty buildings at any given time will be swept away by nature, while only the more well-engineered masterpieces will last for centuries, but this might give the impression that there was a utopia a long time ago
i personally think things keep getting worse, but a bunch of cool buildings on its own isn't good evidence of that, is all
also use more periods/commas in your paragraphs, dickhead
