>>23863175>insecurity is used to make people do things...well that's one of the benefits of mass immigration, isn't it? at least from the perspective of the ruling elite; it reduces social cohesion by putting a violent, primitive race nearby to a civilised high-trust people
this makes them insecure, which, if you've forgotten, means 'not secure'—which we're not, if every time we visit the Christmas market we risk being eviscerated by a muslim driving a lorry because he hates native people, and the left let him into our country
and so it is life-or-death for us, whether you want to consider it as such or not
I personally happen to value Western civilisation—and its monumental achievements—greatly, and have absolutely no desire to see my country turned into a 'melting pot' of rapidly-diminishing IQs, a backwards slide into prehistoric religiosity, and the overturning of every hard-fought-for right for women, gays, children, and the working class
it's a strange far-right who fight for the rights of gay Englishmen, but here we are
if the shoe fits
insecurity is used to make people do things, and NOT do things
that's exactly why Amazon try to make their warehouses as diverse as possible—studies show the the more diverse, the less likely the workforce is to organise, form, or join unions
so before we can solve this problem, we have to remove the people responsible for it
and these people are the neomarxist left
hence the culture war
you want to frame it as a single, large conspiracy, as Curtis often hints at?
it's multiple, with myriad factions, many of whom Curtis simply isn't allowed to name on the fucking BBC
