>>23900562they fear going to war, that is all, and once it starts it starts
another curious comparison to ru, is that they are loosing (practically) irreplicable equipment they obtained during their zenith as the soviet union. so, once america decides to go to war with the world (and cement its descent from being a global power), it will also lose equipment that was built from material/components from across the globe, and will have an exceedingly difficult time procuring material while ramping up war time production to both replace and create the necessary quantities of equipment WHILE its infrastructure and logistics is being destroyed.
us victory in ww2 was relatively easy because europe, ru, the uk blunted germany's war machine well before the us even entered the war, also japan's capacity to wage war was significantly weakened by its involvement in china. this time america will be the aggressor and rush in guns blazing (pretty sure one of the dipshits used that exact phrase) under the same superiority delusion as the russians and the nazis, and with similar corrupt incompetent leadershit, for additional lols.
and, quite likely, as with ru, america will not use its nukes, certainly not against a nuclear armed nation, unless it is nuked first, as such, horrific american losses gradual attribution and defeat akin to germany's, as it turns out saying you're teh best strongest boi is not enough
and, also, despite delusional dan's delusion that ru/china are his besties, it is practically assured that if they enter the war on the america's side, it would only be until america is weakened and they have a chance to pounce (or at least snatch up territory from beleaguered nations), the same if they remain neutral at the outset.
CONCEPTS OF A PLAN let. us. watch.
