>>23915847>How far fetched do you think it is assuming? Extremely far fetched, to the point of hilarious and Saturday Morning Cartoon conspiracy.
Here's the interesting proposition, if you think the reason is ego, and if I am smarter than other people, with this big ego, why would I forgo my overinflated ego on things that are comically below me, or haven't personally hit my ego?
I mean, you are right, what I dealt with were indeed, ego wounds, personal offenses, personal hurts. However, do you think me a bully of all persons, a raving mad dog striking out at every and anyone? Don't be so ridiculous in your argument.
Do I have the means? Absolutely, so does anyone else with a decent enough clever drive, however, what you are lacking is motivation to waste my time with things that frankly, again, are beneath me, and not worth my time, especially if my ego wounds are the main motivator in why it is I do what I do, against the very small section of people I do it against.
You mentioned cat anon, and I did not respond, because again, that has no relevance to me personally, I do not care. Same with Matt; that has no relevance to me, I do not care.
Now mention Leto, Lemur, Kuz, Sobot, Fatcat, Kaguya, Boymoder, Reiko, Darkheart, Klask, Maximus, Mattlav, Beatloaf? Then suddenly my interest is piqued, because those people are within my realm of interest.
My scope of interests are very limited, whereas you assume it is global, simply because I have the means to do so, and do so against people whom I've perfectly good, and justifiable motive against, however, you cannot state a motive for anything beyond that, other than "Well you could."
Which is very very true, I could, but why would I? It serves me no purpose, and they did not wound me personally. If there is evidence to the contrary, then you'd have something, but that doesn't exist, because they haven't.
That's the flaw in your perspective, assumption of motive towards non targets, where none exists.
