>>23964498>but giving up any percentage to Bocana for freeAgain, why are you making assumptions when very little information about how this will actually work has been announced?
The tokenization offers money to run the mining operation without having to go through dilution. It's advertised as an alternative to dilution.
I don't even know how this is supposed to work and neither do you.
We can only speculate.
>even if no deal is made, which is very likely to be the case, they are not liable for anything using that rhetoric.Any deal can go south. That's why we speculate on these stocks.
Management has decades of experience in the industry, I don't think they're just going to scam right now and destroy their reputations.
>Lots of people works in finance and know other people who works in financeI'm talking about their contacts and ability to create complex deals.
>or have the skills to succesfully run a business.The finance board members aren't the CEO. The CEO, Tim has experience running businesses.
>>is expected toYou read that wrong, they're talking about the expected total of the loan. My point was they said Boca doesn't have to contribute equity capital.
Look desu I'm not an expert on all of this shit. I have a moderate amount of knowledge on mining stocks and just go with my best guess. I've made a lot of money so far. You may be right, but time will tell.
Even if they simply buy the Arizona property and the assays come out good(which are expected to happen because they previous assays were great), I will make money, so I'm happy.
>>23964526We will see what happens.
