Quoted By:
Historically men who had wives just fucked men in secret, it was never really that secret, it just undermined the raising of children.
There was a fear that... wait for it... pride and equal gay-gender rights would lead to children being gay, and adults having sex with children, and transgenderism, boys identifying as girls, adults having sex with trans kids, and general societal dysfunction. In hindsight, totally baseless fear, we don't have any of those problems now... none.
And it's not like the corporate medical industry in fact sells these cosmetic surgeries and drugs, the damage they do is irreversible and inter generational, hormone treatments cause cancer and serious life altering illness.
The life outcomes of trannies, that's everyone else's fault. The near universal prostitution, drug abuse, suicide, poverty, early death, that's our fault as a society not a direct outcome of the cosmetic surgery.
Wife implies child bearing. The whole point of marriage was to ensure children had generational inheritance and care.
The difference between a wife and a girlfriend? Children, attempting to have them, a man promising to look after a woman if she got pregnant, and a man being legally bound to do so.
So I'm sorry, two men who cannot reproduce cannot get married. Neither from a tax, social or ethical point of view.
Fetishists do not have rights, any special privelidge, if they can't function day to day, manage their affairs, that's entirely on them.