>>2459763Your alot harder to agrue with than the previous guy who went on and on about the trinity. So ill give you props for that. I always want to thank you for giving me a different view of things. So my applogizes for name calling eariler.
>>2459196>it is impossible for an atheist to have ideals because they are nihilists. the universe has no meaning, and every action in their life is an attempt to create meaning in order to justify their decision not to kill themselves. Why do we need a meaning in life. I don't see a purpose. Neither do animals but they don't kill themselves off. A ideal is just gives someone direction like a religion, to some regards. Your basing your statement on the idea that all atheists are nihilists. Subjective in nature yes, life is meanless unless given a purpose.
>empathy is not a core trait shared by humansBased on what? If its a cagotization then, what problem are you trying to point out, selfishness can fall into the same fallacy too. Even if its a justification to empathy, so what? What are you trying to get at? That selfishness = bad? Nihilism = bad?
I swear no "le reddit spacing meme"
>at which point does your atheistic life stop being selfish and solipsistLike before empathy and selfishness can be catorgized. I feel like your moral ground if a person is selfish then it is bad. What position are you trying to take that people who are religious always moral and true? Solipsism, is flawed in a few regards here, what are you trying to get at with solipism?
Your arguements are starting to confuse me.
>>2459205Though im mainly trying to talk to the other guy. The theory has more backings and more ways that it can be shown, and parts proven in certain areas. Thats what a theory is.
>>2459404>or you somehow seem to care very much about peoples 'feelings'Didnt you state that is was genetic altruism. Then it would serve a role and a purpose, if the emotions were fake then no purpose would be served.
