>>2501910I just need to provide a link to my personal blog, where i claim the thing i want to write on wikipedia, as source, and i can do everything i want.
Even fucking Buzzfeed is a "reliable source" according to Wikipedia.
If nobody starts an editing war, it will stay there. And if there is an editing war, there is a 50% change that i will win.
But if i know a Mod, then i can add anything i like, and whenever someone changes it, i can change it back, and if he starts an editing war, the article will just get locked with my version. And then the other guy who wants to change it will have to write on the Talk page about it... which is pretty much pointless, because "this source is reliable / no it is not" never have any result. And as long as there is no result, it will just keep being locked on my version.
If you don't want people to revert your changes, you just have to start an argument. Arguments on Talk pages are useless and they will lead to the article getting locked (which is what you want).
