>>2502965see my post
>>2502962In this case you are accurate.
Because a recessive gene is masked and not removed. The recessive gene can be passed to the child. When that child has a child it also can pass the recessive gene by pure chance.
Which is why you have a 50% chance to have a blue eyed/brown eyed child.
If the family line has had brown eyes for some time it becomes less and less likely.
However just because your child has brown eyes doesn't mean the child's child will. Since it now carries your recessive gene.
Recessive genes can stay in the family line for untold amounts of time.
Brown eyes also have a good chance of mutation to another eye color, while blue eyes rarely if ever mutate to anything other than green and green rarely mutates to anything other than blue.
Effectively green eyes will be the most likely eye color in the future with blue being close behind. Brown will be the least likely color.
This is of course if you keep race mixing.
As it is right now, brown eyes will be dominate just by sheer number of niggers and chinks.
/pol/ is wrong in this regards, only chance of whites surviving is by breeding with our own females and the females of other races.
By putting the recessive genes in every race it makes them ticking time bombs.
