>>2511861nah, i'm not teasing, i guess i forgot the discussion, thanks for clarifying.
we have something similar to what you just described, but it's due to completely different rules at play so i think it's not related. it has more to do with what the human brain considers specific numbers and what it considers abstract numbers. and it only concerns inanimate objects (including animals)
>eдин кoн>двa кoня>тpи кoня>чeтиpи кoня>10 000 кoнeam i explaining this properly? for small numbers, the regular plural rules apply, but for a larger number, the plural form changes. is it at all similar to your palacinki rules?
