>>2631287The idea that the Nazis were against classicism in architecture is demostrably wrong; completely absurd. You still can't build a fucking Corinthian capital in Berlin today specifically because of the connotations classicism bears with Speer and Ruin Theory you massive faggot. Daniel Libeskind has written about this and he is a fucking Jew. Also, Der Speigel refused to publish the fucking article because they were pissed about it, so Libeskind took their rejection letter and his original article and published it with a competitor.
The idea that Nazi 'renders' were never more than vapourwave is a retarded criticism if only for being so of-the-current-year it fucking hurts. But I'll break it down for you: Look at the work of Willhelm Kries. Do the Totenburgen look like eastern bloc communes to you? You do understand that the commune was a heretofore unimagined building typology specifically invented by the constructivists to reaffirm the communist way of life, right? Comparing Fascist architecture to Soviet architecture like they're the same--are you serious? Look at the Nazi Pavilion at the Paris world's fair and then the Soviet Pavilion. Read an Architecture of Desire; read Leon Krier. There I just gave you a whole bibliography faggot.
This is spiking my blood pressure. However, because you're replying to yourself in this thread it's become apparent that you're a shill so I no longer give a fuck.
