>>2769981All of existence in the universe exist in a continuous spectrum. Why would irrelevant human sexuality be any different? Why would that be the only constant to have a on off option?
Look at genesis and the jew parts of the bible, some really old smart sand people trying to figure out creation and existence. They try to write early laws. But as wise as they are, they don't fully understand the world. Is shrimp evil? Should someone be stoned to death for eating it? How about wearing a cotton poly blend? Should they be exiled from town?
Shrimp was a hard thing to categorize in a perfect box. Again human brain loves to do this. Helps us keep track of information and advance rapidly as a species, the downside is when we're so rigid in our compartmentalizing thought, we don't change or explore other possibilities.
Eventually we learned that "if it's in the water it's fish" isn't the natural only option. When shrimp came around, it wasn't a fish. Well fuck, guess it's a sin then? Same with faggots. It didn't make traditional sense to them in the way they thought existence came to be.
