>>2821285I do not understand... Let me tell you what does anarchism and classical communist moves, like marxism, leninism etc. strive for, what is their final goal. They want a world with no countries, no money, no discrimination, world of full and true equality. This is what we call "communism" (and that's why something like "communist state" cannot exist, communism by definition disallows existence of any countries, any borders), although a lot of people think that is anarchy and communism is what USSR had. No. And now, how there can be differences between the "anarchy" of "communist" kind and of "capitalist" kind?
Although, anarchism init of itself is a pretty naive idea, well, you could tell that whole idea of being able to achieve communism is, yes, probably, but anarchism is even more naive. Marx at least noticed that people would have to change to achieve the final step in social development, according to his theory. So, I guess, if the meaning of the whole term "anarchism" was lost somewhere, not much of value was lost ;)
