>>2871934>t. tinfoilerMaybe you keep finding names and addresses associated with these channels because every time their Adsense accounts get suspended, they're forced to use a fake address and name to get around the ban?
Seriously, if you've actually done any research into what's going on, you'd know that the vast majority of the people involved don't live in countries where their real estate taxes would be visible online, nor do they use their real names.
Think about it, faggot.
Then again, you're probably an underagefag.
But if you really want to know where I got this information, I work for a YouTube network (not saying which one but it isn't Maker) and deconstruct the trend algorithms each week since YouTube themselves don't publish this information.
It's my job to analyse the activity of these channels as they're often the first to pick up on slight variations within CPM and trend algorithms.
If I can't figure it out, I use the exact same methods they use, upload hundreds of blank videos and use those to detect what changes have been made.
>>2871942Youtube can detect the same video uploaded twice on the same channel, to prevent you from re-uploading a video that was removed via a community strike. However, this system doesn't detect the same video on two existing channels. This system also detects Adsense abuse, so the same video removed and uploaded again won't generate any revenue, and can also get your CPM lynched. The only way around this is uploading the same video on multiple channels, or by making small changes, usually reversing the video, mirroring the video or adding a window around it.
The latest content review bot used by Google (It's actually Google bots repurposed for content moderation) has started lowering the CPM as a precaution when it detects windows around videos as it's a way around copyright detection, so the multiple channel option remains the best.
