>>3082881Jesus this is on the verge of being sad (if its serious, which Im not so sure about).
I dont really know or care about relativity much since the special kind is pretty simple and not that useful, and the general kind isnt even close to being something finished or useful, so Im focusing on the part thats about quantum mechanics, which Einstein actually got his nobel prize for.
The part about the photoelectric effect is pretty short, and not in a single line do they refute anything that einstein discovered AT ALL.
I assume this is either because they have no idea whatsoever about the physics behind it, or that if they do, they just coulnt find anything at all that would prove that any of it is wrong or plagiarized.
The only thing they do in that regard is list names of people who should be credited instead of Einstein.
Namely:
>HilbertThe jews supposedly didnt want him to be famous, because he came from a german family (even though his first name is David...) and because his grandfathers second name was Fürchtegott Leberecht. The amount of denial in just alone this is astonishing.
>Max PlanckHere the jews didnt want him to get a nobel prize in 1922 over einstein, because he came from a family of theologians and because he stayed in germany during world war II, a whole 20 years after the fact.
Spoiler alert: Max Planck had already won a nobel prize for physics 4 years before, but I guess the jewish cabal was too busy to notice at the time.
>Erwin SchrödingerThis one didnt get the nobel prize because he, too, would be supporting the nazis decades after, which the jews obviously already knew. He would also go on to "teach at the adolf hitler university" (which has never existed anywhere in the world).
Except that he didnt. And except that he was opposed to nazism. And except that the jews would completely change their minds and award him with a nobel prize in 1933 after all!
>Werner HeisenbergNo more characters left but he got a prize too.
Now stop.