>>3094747If you want to debate this join this tinychat:
https://tiny ch4t .com/room/bantdebates
tinychat
>Treat me as a person, not as a movement.How am I not?
I am just referring to what marxists actually believe.
Are we not talking about them and their movement(communism)?
>I am a bit confused by an anarcho-capitalist (correct me if I am wrong) wanting a "state"...I'm not ancap, see my other post.
>Why is it bad?Because it's what keeps communities together, it's what communities most identify with.
When different cultures invade communities the community gets broken up.
It's an extremely bad thing.
>They would just be a part of a bigger equal community consisting of every person in the world.This is fucking retarded for many reasons, look up Dunbars number. It's impossible to have a massive community with people you don't even know.
Also mentally, people feel less close to people from DIFFERENT cultures than their own culture. It's just basic biology and it's a good thing.
>Making everyone equal would make most of the people actually "richer" although, currency would not exist, Wrong, and you need to learn some economics.
The working class(non-capitalists) buy and consume 99% of all consumer goods.
People wouldn't be richer at all.
The working class already GETS what it produces. How would anyone be better off?
Are you magically going to produce more things?
How can you get more than what is virtually everything?
>How do you know?Evolutionary psychology, human instincts, the structure of the human brain, empirical evidence from human history etc etc.
If communism existed, people would quickly put a stop to it.
Communism isn't even desirable.
>but you do know that IQ doesn't measure anything other than abillity to solve IQ test, right?Wrong. IQ tests are G loaded.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G_factor_(psychometrics)Do you honestly believe humans are exactly the same in cognitive ability?
Don't tell me you are that stupid.
