Quoted By:
3D is inflective more degenerate, and I'll elaborate with a convincing explanation;
consider the case of 2d porn. as mentioned be my esteemed friend above, it is unnatural. this, we can safely say it cannot be found irl. thus, it has to be artificially manufactured. since there is a dearth of actors irl who are too dimensional, the Creator must take it upon himself to create the characters from scratch. every aspect of the characters, their very expressions and manifestations of the duality of conscious and subconscious intertwined and writhing on a humble piece of paper. thusly, much effort goes into production. the more popular works will be those of the better artist, the better storyteller, the conscientous worker, the perseverant man. thus, 2d porn rewards hard work and technical skills.
how does this compare to three dimensional pornography? verily, such creations are possible as you venture into a third dimension too, but we must ask ourselves, "but is it really?" to the layman, it is. but the truth is far from it- we see a shocking lax in the skill we have ere taken for granted. this is due to the economics of scale. what (((producer))) in his right mind would pay an honest artist to labourously create a pornographic video that is three dimensional and aesthetic, when instead he can get the Whore on the street to fuck ten guys in the same span of time, resulting in higher profit margins for (((him)))???
what does this mean? what is this kikery really rewarding? physical beauty, that one wins or loses in the lottery of birth? perhaps. promiscuity? definitely. hotel? trivago.
