>>3111970Whoa, how are you going to stop me? By showing me how I'm wrong, maybe? Protip; you can't, because I'm not. Just because you can say "nooo that's capitalism!!" doesn't mean it's not a valid criticism of Chinese communism as well.
Current Chinese culture is an artificial amalgam of various old traditions. It's constructed to provide a national identity for the Chinese people, even though it has nothing to do with their actual roots. They're also super careful to preserve everything of historical or cultural value they can find, because one part of the communist revolution in China was to purge the nation of everything from the past.
>>3111986You're grasping for straws. Are you unable to answer my question? Let me ask you again: Why should the North Korean government accept American interference in domestic matters?
Also, why did the US interfere in the first place?
It's either "You can't have nukes but we can! Lol, why? Because we say so!", or it's to protect the global petrodollar economy from energy independent nationalist states.
NATO is a piss poor example anyway. As
>>3112040 pointed out, NATO exists primarily to protect American interests. They get military bases closer to Russia, and we have to buy American military equipment for a set percentage of the state budget every year.
