>>3133808there's that too, but i think it's a mix of both PC and sheer incompetence. i honestly don't see the point of submitting a picture of someone and getting a result "best guess: person". there's nothing pc about that, as far as i can tell. it's just retarded. or when you google the pic here, you get: "mais engraçada do mundo".
what frightens me is that they might have rolled out some vastly superior algorithm from the previous one that needs time to learn. of course i have no reason to think that, but still.
a third option is sort of what you said - by making the results shitty and useless, they are deliberately reducing the amount and quality of information we have access to. they already have an overwhelming monopoly, so maybe they think they can get away with worsening their service
