>>3134963>t. s4sfagi visited [s4s] once, and only once. i frankly don't care for the board.
i will agree that kek_specialist may as well be an [s4s]fag, but only a few of the people you've labeled as an [s4s]fag are aware that they're posting [s4s] memes. i've had a quick lurk at [s4s] while posting this, both in the catalog and in the archives, and few of the [s4s]fags you've labeled don't post [s4s] memes that i've seen.
>s4s tier autismexcept, just because of the way someone posts and what they post doesn't make them an [s4s]fag. it may make them seem like one in your eyes, but they aren't always.
>they don't contribute with anythingthere's 2 ways of looking at this: one being that they do contribute something because they actually post to the board in the first place, and the other one being that nobody really contributes anything anyways.
>if someone makes a completely stupid threads it will spread like fucking malaria.there's no way of telling that. if i post a thread with a fucking chicken nugget as the image, there's no way of telling if that'll spread.
of course, there already was an active [s4s]fag from the time they started cropping up, but still, you can't predict that /bant/ will become [s4s] 2.0 or that the [s4s] presence in /bant/ will slowly die out.
