>>3192894I believe in intelligent creator myself, though, the argument with recurring patterns with special stuff going for them is severly flawed. To show that, I will go outside of our universe. Imagine some other universe, with different laws, maybe even so different that we could hardly call it a place in time (which it could just not possess) or maybe notice etc. Due to the law I will call A that appears in that universe, everything in the shape of letter A is very stable and efficient, so lots of different things are shaped like letter A, won't list them out, because msot probably nothing close to such things exists in our universe (talking about "shape" isn't exactly right too, but I don't want to complicate stuff even more). So, let's say that some form of conscious being lives in that place and starts to notice such pattern. In desire to describe how it behaves, he applies a system that he came up with for exact reason of describing the world he lives in and it appears to have some very peculiar properties in the system. Now, was it certainly a higher being that came up with all that to be so efficient that way? Well, we know that it wasn't, it just randomly happened. What gave those traits to that shape, number, or whatever the conscious being uses, was the being itself. It's obvious that a thing that is special in his universe would be special in the system based on laws of the universe, isn't it?
Sorry for any mistakes and such, I am a bit tired, writing this.
