>>3242218Yep, women losing the post-Wall market of beta providers will destroy feminism over-night.
Many women will never catch onto this, even when it happens. They literally think their holes are a lifelong trump card.
But those betas are the bulk tax payers in our society and they will reduce their work/earnings to the absolute minimum
to sustain their sexbot lifestyle and their hobbies. No saving for a big family home or someday wife (when he's achieved status in his 30s).
They'll reduce their taxes to the absolute minimum.Probably even worth while for them to start a lobby-group, to argue that their
required contributions are too high onerous for their lowered participation rates in society at large.
Then suddenly, it's women who have to pay for everything. No more baby gibs. Which means they have to do the real, productive jobs.
Not the easy HR filler shit they've been coasting on for decades. The real stressful shit guys have been killing themselves doing all this time.
Suddenly that "career freedom" is a ball and chain. And doll-fuckers will be busy creating a new cultural lore around biomen being free of biowomen.
Making their own movies, books and comics about the new post-roastie world. Fighting for their right to reproduce using synthetic wombs.
No more family court alimony raping. Can choose their children to be males. Erase females from the equation all together.
Be truly inventive. Be explorers, creators and boundary-pushers again. Keep their new technology to themselves.
Thrive without female interruptions and headgames and stress-creating. Embrace the inner male autist.
I've put a lot of extra mustard on this, but that's what the sexbot future holds.
The release of male energy from serving female vanity.
There's limitless horizons when that happens.
Feminism is unsustainable without a male serf-class to financially prop it up.
"Manism" however, doesn't need female involvement at all.
