>>3311161Being a free market enthusiast/anarcho-capitalist, I have no inclination to generate any kind of State. Rather, I believe that in a society that is allowed to freely associate how they see fit, ethno communities will naturally form. On the market, I don't believe in racial discrimination. On the market, only the value signals generated through profit matter to me. If the society believes you are valuable, then more money will come your way. Whatever this means for racial groups is irrelevant to me, however I can make some predictions based upon racial demographics that only those blacks that are above the curve will do well in a society I am describing. This is because success on the market necessitates the ability to think long term and suspend gratification long enough for your primary investment to see a return.
Whites have historically been the best at this investment process. Jews have historically been the best at subverting it, using the State. The Chinese have been the best at working in unison with State regulation (USA regulations on labor are white Chinese labor and conditions are so bad, due to this). Blacks, however, have historically done extremely poorly on the open market. Their countries don't produce goods on their own, but rather they must be forced into productive behavior. In a society predicated upon free market ideals, in which things like warlords producing diamonds would be priced out by free market labor controls and ethical dilemmas, the only blacks which would succeed would be those capable of innovation, of which there are few.
tl;dr, I wouldn't make an ethno state, but I would definitely imagine that ethno communities would form and that the free market would drastically reduce the survivability of most of the black population.
