>>3374500alright let me really explain to you how the market will react when title ii net neutrality is repealed. first off the red tape by the government costs a whole lot of money each year, billions and billions of dollars for taxpayers to regulate those companies. we will get a nice cut off our taxes if it is repealed. second, the ISP companies have to deal with legal issues due to their systems sometimes picking up illegal content, so they will actually be able to filter out the illegal content more effectively due to them not needing to provide connection to sites like piratebay and much worse.
so here's where it gets interesting, everyone is worried about their ISP companies censoring what they do. but does anyone not remember the internet before title ii net neutrality was put in place? it's a massive scare tactic used by you and lots of other people, both in the mainstream and alternative medias. also to tackle the problem theoretically on why they probably won't do that (and what will happen if they do), you'll just need to think about how people will react if they piss off their consumers. let's say a company starts censoring content and pissing off the person that is paying them, they will lose the business of that person and he/she will try to find a different provider that does not do that. if no current companies are not being assholes, then demand in the market is created for ISPs that don't censor content. new businesses will be created and consumers will flock to them, and that problem is simply resolved.
and here is why the government regulation of the ISP market has bogged them down and given power to a few companies that have dominated over the time it was implemented. the FCC's "internet conduct" standard, gives them a mandate to review business models and pricing plans that were supposed to benefit consumers. but if a company does not want to sell expensive, unlimited data plans, then they will be regulated by the FCC to do so...
