>>3412403Right... okay... you're next-level...
Fine.
If these massive laboratories were automated (which they will be in the near future) by unconscious AI and robots, the data accrued WILL STILL BE THE SAME.
It is not a conscious mind 'magicking' it into existence with mere observation like a rendering field-of-view protocol in a videogame there to conserve processing power...
The measuring equiment is detecting things WITHOUT anyone; in the end a computer compiles the data and lastly it can be read by a person.
If your argument is something along the lines of the philosophical claim "If a tree falls in the woods, does it make a sound? No" then that's a separate issue, because there you can argue 'sound' is an interpretation within the mind of a conscious creature and what it makes until something 'hears' it are merely... "atmospheric energy waves".
But those "atmospheric energy waves" are. still. happening.
Quantum particles are still doing what they're doing.
You've misread or misinterpreted the science, and you're using your void of ignorance to stuff your woo and wishful thinking, like a lazy child 'cleaning his room' by jamming it all under the bed where his parent's are unlikely to look.
There's absolutely a philosophical argument to be made for the metaphysical value of human consciousness and interpretation, but this is NOT the battleground for it.
