>>3420390I'm a shill for /pol/, I remember when /pol/ had
>well thought out OP>no porn/whores in op .jpg>citations were needed>links were provided>peer review were posted>flood of info and stats with sources>sources were vetted >proper arguments (no logical fallacies)>and if you were called out as JIDF it was for a reasonI can only hope it all returns if you were around ,you'll understand. until then I'll just sit here and wait