>>3431222there is nothing wrong with qt 2d lolis
a drawing that depicts something fucked up isn't in and of itself something to worry about
it's a fucking drawing
>>3432377if you're gonna go fuck a real human kid, you've got issues, plain and simple
wouldn't be averse to fucking a robot, but they're actually planning on making that that illegal
>>3434651>I woundnt say they are necessarily dangerous, but they do pose a rist being around people that are underage.this is unironically fearmongering, what kind of wishy-washy language is that
like, there's plenty of people who are into rape porn, does this mean they're gonna go rape a woman?
>>3434352no
fuck no
that's not hot at all
>>3434267his faces and proportions are ugly as shit (sometimes, the faces do nail that fucked up ahegao look perfectly though)
>>3434859>They wouldn’t have made a personal website and track their every move if they were not shown to be a harm to the general public.the criteria for getting on the list (because you've shown capability to harm) is generally reasonable with one exception I've seen -- if you're jacking off and a kid sees you, that can put you on the list, and good fucking luck getting out of that since those in power care more about looking good and "putting scum away"
